Wednesday, July 31, 2013

Schooooooool's out! for! summer!


On Monday, I had my last session of Teaching With Technology until September. The activity from that day that stuck with me most wasn’t actually technology-based, which isn’t unusual for this class. (More on that later in this post.) Four of us volunteered without knowing what we were doing, and we were sat down at tables facing away from each other. At first, I thought we were going to do something competitive, but I was happy to find that, in fact, we were working as a single unit. I much prefer working as a group than working in competition – competitive games are zero-sum, and I hate the added dimension of the impossibility of everyone coming out happy - if you try your best, you please your teammates, but it means the other teams are more likely to have an unhappy outcome. Furthermore, it means keeping discoveries from people on the other team, which in turn complicates even sharing these discoveries with people on your team since you don't want the "others" to hear. When everyone works together, there's none of that inner-conflict, so it's all about problem-solving, curiosity, teamwork and fun.

Each table was given an envelope with puzzle pieces and we had to piece together the puzzle. The thing is that we each only had half the puzzle, so we had to figure out how to put it together, without seeing the pieces the other pair had. First, we figured out more or less what we had, and put together a decent chunk, and then we started talking with the other pair. I systematically went through the pieces, from bottom left to bottom right, then the next row up, etc, until we had accounted for every piece. It was a fun and satisfying game. But what's it got to do with technology?

One thing I love about this class is that we never start with technology and try to find a lesson to fit it. We start with problems and then we try to figure out how to solve them in our class discipline, and then we see where technology fits into the picture. I like this method a lot, because I'm starting to see how tech really does fit in to a lot of lessons in a logical and useful way. Now that I see how tech can expand my students' options, if it's used correctly, I have a much more positive attitude about it.

 It’s been a really great class, and I’ve learned a lot in this short time. I wouldn’t say that my technological skills have increased drastically, yet I’ve learned to use a number of new programs. To be honest, I don’t think I even used a shared GoogleDoc until starting this program (and I’m trying to accept that having shared spreadsheets means sometimes giving up the idea of alphabetization, since most people just add themselves to the bottom of the document. In case anyone reading this is wondering, I am the one who’s been putting everyone in alphabetical order when we make contact-sheets, dinner plans, etc.) I think the biggest thing for me was just becoming more familiar with different computer programs, and realizing that using new ones isn’t so daunting.

Edited August 6th: Apropos of using "new" programs – I've just made my first PowerPoint Presentation! I am inordinately proud - I think I am now officially as technologically advanced as the average Victorian... maybe even the average Edwardian! Anyhow, glad I got that milestone over with before starting to teach on my own.

7 comments:

  1. But, are you alphabetizing by the name input or are you breaking it out into first and last name in separate columns in order to be able to sort the information in more ways? How about codifying how people enter things into the database? I find I keep wanting to "fix" all the inputs, but have to check myself, knowing that it's not "my" document.

    It was a lot of fun working on the puzzle...many other ideas with that. I really appreciated reading your response to it...especially the non-competitive edge to it. Group games where everyone works towards a common goal are awesome!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When people only put their first name, I add their last initial so I can justify putting them in the right place in the alphabet. Because clearly this is a good use of my time.

      Delete
    2. As a counter-argument, in collaborative spreadsheets often the most crucial piece of information is who has added themselves to the document since you last looked at it. So for the Rachel dinner spreadsheet, I would open it and glance at the bottom lines to see if there was any new information. I'm now realizing that since it's been alphabetized, I might have accidentally missed some new inputs. If I had known it was alphabetical, I would have had to memorize the whole list, then check to see if anything was new, or look at the revisions history, which is a lot clunkier. So I'd like to respectfully request that you don't alphabetize any spreadsheets I start, if you don't mind! :)

      Delete
    3. Eeep! Sorry, Anne, I didn't even think about that issue! I will keep myself in check next time.

      Delete
  2. I definitely think this class is about more than technology. Now that it's ended, I think that technology is almost metaphorical, a stand-in for "innovation" (think about the loose definition of "game" that's been used throughout).

    I agree with your observation about competition. I, too, often feel bittersweet when I win a competition because I feel bad for the "losers." But, when I lose, I usually find the frustration necessary for self-growth. So maybe when we can't avoid competitive games (or when we want to draw on the benefits of competition, like increasing interest and motivation), we can teach kids how to deal with losing.

    Thanks for a thoughtful post!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think you're right about teaching people to accept not winning all the time. But I just don't like the idea of setting a goal that, by definition, at least half of the people won't succeed at. I don't mind racing the clock, though, because I don't have to worry about the feelings of the abstract notion of time.

      I think you offer a good perspective, and it's definitely food for thought. I'll be thinking about the benefits and drawbacks of competition before deciding how to impliment these sorts of activities in my class. Thanks for the comment!

      Delete
  3. I really liked your quote: One thing I love about this class is that we never start with technology and try to find a lesson to fit it.

    This is something that has been so striking to me throughout the semester. We shouldn't use technology just because it's there, but because it has a bigger purpose in the overall learning for our students. I'm glad that the class has been such a great learning experience thus far! I quite agree and can't wait to see what the fall semester brings! Learning about technology in this day and age is going to be pretty beneficial when we have our own classrooms.

    ReplyDelete